*恭喜浙江省农业科学院俞老师在SCI期刊 Environmental Science and Pollution Research(IF:2.914)上成功发表
*恭喜西安理工大学张老师,环境水利专业,文章成功发表在SCI期刊Environmental Science and Pollution Research上,IF2.914
*恭喜山东交通学院谢老师在SCI期刊APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE(IF5.15)上成功发表
*恭喜华中科技大学黄老师在SCI期刊 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces(IF8.456)上成功发表
*恭喜中南大学湘雅医院黄医生在Frontiers in Oncology(IF 4.137)上成功发表
*恭喜复旦大学辛博士在SCI期刊 FEBS LETTERS(IF2.675)上成功发表
*恭喜中南大学陈博士在THIN-WALLED STRUCTURESSCI期刊(IF3.488)上成功发表
*恭喜湖南工学院郭老师在SCI期刊SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY(IF2.42)上成功发表
*恭喜东华大学闫老师在SCI期刊Advanced Functional Materials(IF 15.621)上成功发表
*恭喜安徽医科大学肖老师在SCI期刊BMC CELL BIOLOGY(IF 3.485)上成功发表
*恭喜四川大学华西医院谢医生在SCI期刊European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care(IF 3.734)上成功发表

0591-83301811

周一~周日, 8:00 - 23:00

13107667616

周一~周日, 8:00 - 23:00

service@editideas.cn

随时欢迎您的来信!

2021年最新SCI期刊影响因子查询系统

期刊名称:
ISSN:
期刊研究方向:
IF范围:
中科院分区:
SCI/SCIE:
是否OA期刊:
排列方式:

ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 期刊详细信息

基本信息
期刊名称 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
期刊ISSN 1382-4996
期刊官方网站 https://www.springer.com/journal/10459
是否OA
出版商 Springer Netherlands
出版周期 Tri-annual
始发年份 1996
年文章数 55
最新影响因子 3.629(2021)
中科院SCI期刊分区
大类学科 小类学科 Top 综述
医学3区 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES 学科教育3区
HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES 卫生保健与服务3区
CiteScore
CiteScore排名 CiteScore SJR SNIP
学科 排名 百分位 2.52 1.406 1.430
Social Sciences
Education
99 / 1040 90%
补充信息
自引率 8.10%
H-index 48
SCI收录状况 Science Citation Index Expanded
官方审稿时间
网友分享审稿时间 数据统计中,敬请期待。
PubMed Central (PML) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1382-4996%5BISSN%5D
投稿指南
期刊投稿网址 https://www.springer.com/journal/10459/submission-guidelines
收稿范围
Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
The Journal will accept articles on topics such as admissions, problem-based and self-directed learning, faculty development, achievement testing, motivation, curriculum development, curricular comparisons, program evaluation, expertise development, clinical reasoning, continuing education, community-based education, and communication skills (the list is intended as illustrative, not exhaustive). All rigorous methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative, are encouraged. It is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of health professions education: researchers and educators in the fields of medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition and related disciplines.
From the perspective of external validity, it is critical that authors place their study in a theoretical and empirical context. AHSE has no page limit, in order that each paper can be accompanied by a critical review of related research, and the discussion can highlight how the study findings add to knowledge. Authors are encouraged to explore their study from multiple analytical perspectives, to include multiple converging studies if possible, and to specifically state how the study findings add to knowledge in the field.
The editors will not consider studies where the only outcome is a person's opinion or perception of the extent to which they believe they have learned something or improved their skills. The reason is simply that the evidence is consistent that people are not capable of accurate self-assessment, so any form of self-assessed improvement cannot be used as an outcome. Self-assessed measures of confidence or competence may well appear to show large differences in response to an educational intervention, but are themselves weak surrogates for actual achievement.
From the perspective of educational importance, studies of a single course or program with weak evidence of effectiveness, such as student ratings, are discouraged as they are unlikely to add to generalizable knowledge, unless the study permits empirical test of theoretical predictions. Further, evaluations of any technology, without consideration of the mechanisms that lead to an observed change, are of limited value. Similarly, proving that some education is better than no education, an educational “placebo-controlled trial;” has very limited value. We will not consider such studies for publication.
An important criterion for acceptance is educational significance. Studies may be methodologically strong, and effects may be statistically significant, but that does not equate to importance. From the perspective of internal validity, small effects and associations, as are typically observed in studies of personality or learning style, may well achieve statistical significance with large samples but have little educational importance. Similarly, self-assessed measures of confidence or competence may well appear to show large differences in response to an educational intervention, but are themselves weak surrogates for actual achievement.
It is hoped that the absence of a word limit will encourage authors to consider full exploration of a question, including multiple converging studies in the same paper. The Journal strongly discourages multiple publications derived from a single study, unless the questions asked are distinct and non-overlapping. As a matter of policy, authors are required to fully disclose other related publications, either published, submitted or under review. We will not consider submissions where aspects of the study have already been published elsewhere, unless the author makes a convincing case for the distinctiveness of the new submission.
"Reflections"
The Reflections section encourages submissions of various formats. Critical reviews of important developments in the field will be particularly encouraged, since advances in a field can only result from a deep understanding of what has already been accomplished. In addition, the editors encourage submission of new ideas or philosophical musings on health sciences education: papers that are not necessarily empirical in nature.
Manuscripts for Reflections and Reviews must appeal to all readers, regardless of their home health profession (medicine, pharmacy, etc.), educational level of interest (e.g. med student, continuing education) or research discipline (qualitative, experimental, etc.). Only very high quality papers of wide interest will be accepted in the Reflections and Reviews sections. Authors should know that the likelihood of acceptance is quite low.
"Methodologist’s Corner", "From the Archives", and "If I Had Known Then" are special invited submissions which will appear from time to time. Editors of these sections are identified in the journal description and can be approached for potential topics.
收录体裁
投稿指南 https://www.springer.com/journal/10459/submission-guidelines
投稿模板
参考文献格式
编辑信息
近期成功发表案例展示